ಸೋಮವಾರ, ಜನವರಿ 12, 2026

Is Dr. Rajkumar starrer 'Daari Tappida Maga' (1975) psychological thriller, although at surface level its a family drama?

Is Dr. Rajkumar starrer 'Daari Tappida Maga' (1975) psychological thriller, although at surface level its a family drama?

This is not just a family or twin-brother drama. It is actually a psychological thriller. Let us see why I am saying this.

What if I told you that Prashant (or Prakash) is not a real person but just a mental projection of Prasad. Prasad's subconscious mind is trying to playout the 'darker' side of himself. Prakash stands for everything which Prasad isn't.  Prasad is idealist, moralist but suffers from forgetfulness whereas Prashant is sharp, smart but criminal, thief and evil

Prakash is sharp, intelligent but a criminal, womanizer and deceives by impersonating sometimes as CBI officer and sometimes as an ascetic, whereas Prasad is a college professor lives a monotonous life suffering from loss of memory or absent minded to that extent that he even mistakes some other woman has his wife. When that happens, he is very ashamed of himself. He is also obedient son under strong influence of his mother. His forgetfulness is actually indicating that his subconscious mind is occupied by something else. This also proves that Prakash is construction of Prasad's subconscious.

It is shown in the film as if Prasad and Prakash are living their life in a disjointed world which again reinforces that viewer is made to see the Prashant's life through subconscious mind of Prasad. The recurring BGM indicates that Prasad's subconscious goes through a loop which is basically Prakash carrying out heists at various places across India by impersonating. Although darker side of Prasad i.e. Prakash yearns for such heists but at the same time Police DGP also expressed doubt that how come same individual can do so many heists and still escape. This further reinforces that this is not REALITY but is all happening in the Prasad's subconscious. In fact, Prakash says at one point that there can be nobody like him even if his mother would have given birth to another son. 

There are many sequences in which Prasad still in clutches of mother's love to the extent that he is shown as man child. Prasad's wife even chides him about the same. This also indicates that Prasad as an adult man personality is not complete and hence, he is still lost in his subconscious's construct Prakash. On the other hand, Prakash is outgoing, smart and daring and constantly confronts challenges and dangers.

It was only through accident (road accident) the Prakash enters the house of Prasad although Prasad's mother and his wife initially identify him as Prasad till both come in the same frame when Prasad returns from journey. 

Prasad (better/real side) and Prashant (darker/subconscious side) confront each other in duel fight which only ends up in Prasad telling Prakash (sharp, smart and intelligent) that his mother yearns for qualities which Prakash represents and not what Prashant represents, who is immoral, evil, thief and wanted by police.

After this Prasad tries to accept his darker side (sharp but criminal) and even tries to integrate that side into life. At one point, he says he will surrender and allow Prakash to continue his life. This indicates how much Prasad's other side (Prashant) is troubling him. Prashant repeatedly says Prasad, his mother and wife are like gods who stands for virtue and dharma, and he can't see a place in this house. This again Prasad trying to kill or suppress his darker side once for all so that he is not troubled by it. 

So, the very fact that Prasad is absent minded indicates that he is stuck in the loops which his subconscious mind constructs where Prashant is active and does all the things which are evil, bad and other things which are antagonistic to real life Prasad stands/lives for

Jung’s Concept of the Shadow:

The "shadow" represents aspects of your personality that you reject or deny, often because they are considered undesirable or socially unacceptable.

Shadow may contain repressed instincts, weakness

 

Antarangada mRdanga is one of the greatest poetic, but philosophical creations of DR Bendre

Antarangada mRdanga is one of the greatest poetic but philosophical creations of DR Bendre



It really needs quality time and maturity to understand the deeper aspects of this gem of poetry. It is full of metaphors yet sound like romantic separation song at the surface, but that is only packaging or at the best deliberate distraction. If you dig deep, you will enter a different world. That world is full of insights and profound realisation

Introduction:-

First of all, he sets the theme by inviting the readers to 'see' heart, mind and memory as mRdanga and taaLa and tanti respectively. He has beautifully captured why 'naada' acts as primordial consciousness or Brahma as they do in spiritual traditions like ancient shaivism.

1st stanza (what is the crux of the creation or ultimate TRUTH?)

What is the use of 'see'ing such a way? Heart represents the primordial sound or consciousness from which the mind sound is (taaLa) meaning thoughts are derived or synchronized, when you pull the string (tanti).  This actually means that when you start meditating (nenapu) over it, then you will realise that all the thoughts or things (chitta) are essentially derived from Unrealised self (antaranga). Deeper aspect of life or universe can only be understood by meditating over it and only through such a meditation you will realise that everything comes from nothing(void).

ಅಂತರಂಗದ ಮೃದಂಗ ಅಂತು ತೊಂ ತನಾನ 
ಚಿತ್ತ ತಾಳ ಬಾರಿಸುತಲಿತ್ತು ಝಂ ಝಣಣ ನಾನಾ 
ನೆನಪು ತಂತಿ ಮೀಟುತಿತ್ತು ತೊಂತನನ ತಾನ, ತೊಂತನನ ತಾನ, ತೊಂತನನ ತಾನ

2nd stanza (what is its nature and how it came along or how its connected?)

This reflective realisation that 'unrealised self is the root or at the core' has been passed on from several generations. The void of this thread is the primordial unrealised sound, according to some this is the sound 'Om'. Void is getting defeated every time thread is weaving new song (new creations). This means that unrealised self defeats itself in the process of creation. This is the paradox of all the spiritual thinking which answers this question what is that thing which doesn't change. Because any change results in something getting created. only 'void' is the one which doesn't change.

ಹಲವು ಜನ್ಮದಿಂದ ಬಂದ ಯಾವುದೋನೋ ಧ್ಯಾನ
ಏಕನಾದದಂದದೊಂದು ತಾನದ ವಿತಾನ
ತನಗೆ ತಾನೇ ಸೋಲುತಿಹುದು ನೂಲುತಿಹುದು ಗಾನ ||

3rd stanza (Why people or mortals don't realise the TRUTH?)

Unrealised self or the void separated itself from the 'created' one when the world or things was created for the first time which is time immemorial i.e in the begining of a KALPA. Kalpa is defined as A day of Brahmā or 1,000 Yugas, being a period of 432 million years of mortals. Unrealised self is too obscure for the mortals because of this long separation, and they havelost that eye even though they keep seeking. This ignorance is due to the fact that worldly attachments (nelada maNNu) makes mortals keep falling and they never be able to recover and REALISE SELF TRULY.

ಕಲ್ಪದಾದಿಯಲ್ಲೆ ನನ್ನ ನಿನ್ನ ವಿರಹವಾಗಿ
ಎಲ್ಲೋ ಏನೋ ನಿನ್ನ ಹುಡುಕಿ ಕಾಂಬ ಕಣ್ಣೆ ಹೋಗಿ
ಮರೆವೆಗೊಂಡು ಬಿದ್ದೆ ನಾನು ನೆಲದ ಮಣ್ಣು ತಾಗಿ ||


4th stanza (Who are those who can realise this TRUTH and how?)

But when the mortals realise that from the very Darkness (void), Light (matter) sparkles gives rise to all diversity of creations in this world. From the very Silence (void), which is unstable; voice (worldly) takes birth however small it may be. Those mortals who die with this realisation, meaning those people who have this spiritual eye when they die, they experience TRUE REALISATION of SELF or they achieve liberation (moksha) by merging with void. At that very moment of death, they built or sing the song of liberation or realisation.

ಕತ್ತಲಲ್ಲೆ ಬೆಳಕು ಮಿಂಚಿ ಪಡೆದೀತೇಳು ಬಣ್ಣ
ಮೂಕ ಮೌನ ತೂಕ ಮೀರಿ ದನಿಯು ಹುಟ್ಟಿ ಸಣ್ಣ
ಕಣ್ಣ ಮಣ್ಣ ಕೂಡಲಲ್ಲಿ ಹಾಡು ಕಟ್ಟಿತಣ್ಣ ||